Joined
·
1,284 Posts
Hey we finally got our turn!
Tbh these cars had basically nonexistent marketing and they still made no sense when compared to the Insight and Fit and the sales were piss poor. On paper and in practice it was indeed a failure. But his outright dismissal of the car based on nostalgia for the original CRXs is not deserved. I have a 1985 Honda Civic CRX Si. It's way slower and (in stock form at least) handles way worse than a CR-Z in stock form. At least for the US market our CRXs barely revved past 6500. Just because it's old doesn't mean it's better. However, it is much lighter and in theory much more capable when modded correctly.Haven't watched the vid, but I don't know why everyone hates the CRZ and considers it to be a failure...
He hasn't been funny or really relevant since 2016. I used to find his videos fun and interesting but now he just drones on basically narrating Wikipedia articles. I guess his most cringey thing is referencing his strange fetishism in his videos. There's a dark rabbit hole to go down if you really wanna know more but I suggest you don't.Wow definitely not my kind of humor. Insanely cringe.
Didn't even drive a manual car. Dude said he liked the orange contrast inside and the guy replies with one of the dumbest takes I've ever heard on YouTube.
He's right about most of his serious critiques though.
Most likely the owner bought it because it was much cheaper than comparable cars too and just dealt with the issues of driving a smaller car. I would volunteer my own car to have him look at it since mine has the supercharger which he touched on a single time and didn't care to look into at all or explain to the audience. But this guy hasn't really traveled much in a few years so that's highly unlikely.He does make some good points about fuel economy being poor for a hybrid of the time and the CVT being awful. But all CVTs are awful.
A review of the manual may have made a stronger argument for the car.
I think half the review is influenced by the personality of the owner of the car on loan for review.
I agree. I’m looking forward to see Doug DeMuro’s review of the CR-Z…It’s nice to see a video on the CR-Z, but I don’t like his humor to be fair. Just not my style, I guess.
Why it makes no sense? True that fuel economy not so great for a hybrid, but it's still really good compared to it's power. It's true that it's not fast either. But it's never meant to be a boring economy grocery getter or a proper sports car. It's a great balance between those (and it has a manual variant). AFAIK there were no alternatives to it back then. It just gives you a little bit of everything.Tbh these cars had basically nonexistent marketing and they still made no sense when compared to the Insight and Fit and the sales were piss poor. On paper and in practice it was indeed a failure. But his outright dismissal of the car based on nostalgia for the original CRXs is not deserved. I have a 1985 Honda Civic CRX Si. It's way slower and (in stock form at least) handles way worse than a CR-Z in stock form. At least for the US market our CRXs barely revved past 6500. Just because it's old doesn't mean it's better. However, it is much lighter and in theory much more capable when modded correctly.
Honda's competition was ironically themselves with the Honda Fit. Not only did they have similar dimensions and identical powertrains, they shared a lot of suspension components. Fuel economy was similar and so was price. The incentives were just not there for the US market. However, that's not to say there were no incentives for other markets. Countries like the UK got benefits like cheaper registration and insurance because of the hybrid system. So at least for them they did have something to go with. And a manual hybrid is certainly unique.Why it makes no sense? True that fuel economy not so great for a hybrid, but it's still really good compared to it's power. It's true that it's not fast either. But it's never meant to be a boring economy grocery getter or a proper sports car. It's a great balance between those (and it has a manual variant). AFAIK there were no alternatives to it back then. It just gives you a little bit of everything.
The road tax is £20 comparing to £180 for a hatchback with similar petrol engine so even if fuel consumption is not great I can benefit from 2,5 full tanks of petrol per year for free…Countries like the UK got benefits like cheaper registration and insurance because of the hybrid system. So at least for them they did have something to go with.
Yeah, I thought the video was over at 4 minutes because he ran out of steam then just started repeating previous points with different words.Watched the video but not to the end, seems like it was way longer than it needed to be. Guess he's just satisfying the YouTube algorithms.