Honda CR-Z Hybrid Car Forums banner
1 - 4 of 4 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,406 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·

Not All See the CR-X in Honda’s CR-Z


DETROIT — Honda’s telling anyone who will listen that the CR-Z hybrid is the new CR-X.

Not everyone’s buying it.

We’re as guilty as anyone of believing the hype, and I’ll withhold judgment until driving one. But Sam Smith over at Jalopnik isn’t waiting. He’s made a pretty good argument that the CR-Z hybrid, unveiled in production trim here at the North American International Auto Show, is a pretender to the throne.

“It’s a hybrid, it looks cool, and it’s likely to be more entertaining than most green cars,” he writes in his post. “But to my mind, it’s a perfect example of product Fail.”

For the record, Smith owns a 1989 CR-X Si. I’ve owned a ‘90 Si, just like the one pictured at right, and an ‘87 HF. Both were fantastic cars. Even the 58-horsepower(!) HF made a winding road lots of fun. The CR-X proved a car could offer decent performance, excellent handling and superlative fuel economy in an attractive package.

Smith is right in saying the CR-Z doesn’t measure up on paper. It weighs 2,670 pounds and has just 122 horsepower to haul all that bulk. The first-gen CR-X weighed between 1,713 and 1,978 pounds and produced as much as 135 horsepower depending upon the trim level and year. What’s more, the CR-Z is built on the same platform as the 2010 Insight, a car that offers all the driving excitement of a shopping cart.

There’s more than performance at issue here. A lot of people are harping about the car’s 36 mpg (combined), saying it’s appalling for a compact hybrid two-seater. The loudest critics note that the ‘89 CR-X HF got 41 in the city and 50 on the highway under current EPA standards. They’re comparing apples to oranges. The ‘89 HF produced 62 horsepower and weighed 836 pounds less than the CR-Z. It also didn’t have airbags, or traction control, or a six-speaker audio system, or power everything, or navi, or…. All that stuff adds weight, which is an enemy of fuel economy.

But the guys at Jalopnik don’t care much about that, and Smith’s point is simple: The CR-Z is not the new CR-X. It’s not a car that, as he put it, will “make any winding road its bitch” like the CR-X.

I really hope that’s not the case, because the hybrid segment needs a sports car. Perhaps more importantly, Honda needs a sports car. It needs a new CR-X as much as we do.

Read More At: Not All See the CR-X in Honda’s CR-Z | Autopia | Wired.com
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
122 Posts
This article has the weights and horsepower a little skewed for the crx. The most power we ever had was 108hp and the 1991 si was 2174 lbs. The JDM SiR had 160.hp , but we never had that here in the states. Articles like this seem to be biased from sentence 1, and the inaccurate facts really ruin credibility
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
133 Posts
Welcome to the 21st Century

The original CRX was designed 25 years ago, when gas was still a dollar or less and global warming wasn't on the radar. Honda underestimated the popularity of this model. Certainly there were much quicker and faster cars to be had, and great gas mileage was hardly a selling feature in this era. Even the styling had to grow on you; initially it received more criticism than praise. The biggest reason for its sales success was that elusive quality known as Fun-to-Drive.

Now 25 years later, Honda has given us a great looking car, still not the fastest or quickest, but the real measure of its sales success will once again be if it puts a smile on the driver's face while carving through canyons or weaving through traffic. The 21st century interior alone should make most drivers happy.

Mileage? Don't worry about Honda's current conservative estimate. The EPA's may be a little better, but even if it's not, you'll get much better mileage than the 2008 EPA test cycle estimates, which greatly penalize all hybrid cars. Most Prius and Civic Hybrid owners get mileage that equates to the old test standards or better, and there's no reason to believe the CR-Z won't better the new estimates as well, perhaps as much as 40 city/ 50 highway.

Until test drives become available, we'll have to wait to find out if the fun is still in the drive. My bet is on Honda, who rarely fails to deliver on a promise.
 
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top