the "estimated" US numbers are 6MT=31c/37h and CVT=36c/38h... i'm not exactly sure what the conversion to Imperial Gallons is but i'm sure it's closer to the 60mpg mark that people think... and this is tested in "Normal" mode so "Economy" will for sure get better numbers...I have a Civic 2.2 Diesel Type S in the UK, it has 140bhp and good handling. I can get 50-55mph on every day driving and close to 60 mpg on the motorway. I am due to change it in October and would look at a CR-Z but if it only delivers 32-35 mpg think it will be another Civic, especially since the Civic will have more room.
Ford uses a Full-Hybrid System like the Toyota's... Honda's IMA is a Mild-Hybrid System, so of course the numbers will "seem" higher with the other cars as opposed to Honda's... My take on this is, if Honda is getting this kind of mileage from a Mild-Hybrid, i could only imagine what their gonna get in the next 1-3 years when they release a full hybrid system...Funny how Ford can build the huge Fusion Hybrid and get 41mpg city 36mpg hwy 0-60 8.4s while estimates for the tiny CR-Z will be less AND the car will be SLOWER!?!?!?!?!?!?
FAIL!