![]() |
|
|
#281 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 73
|
Quote:
Yea i figure miles will add up quickly with that ill be going 215/40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#282 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I might be rolling on this exact setup this weekend to a meet. if i do ill let you guys know how it is lol. Quote:
The REAR how ever is a full floating axle (non driving/solid) and will not change dramatically in degrees. However my rear toe went slightly more in (i believe it was .02 difference from before) and camber went negative a little (again not more than .02). Its not possible to adjust the rear at all, so constant tire rotations will be the only thing to prevent too much wear (non staggered setups only).
__________________
SSM 11' CRZ EX Tein, Skunk2, Spoon, Blox, PW:JDM, Enkei, Clazzio
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#283 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: LA
Posts: 322
|
Quote:
Not on this car. On double wishbone cars, yes. On vehicles with unequal length a-arm, yes. They can control the rate and direction of the camber gain. On McPherson strut cars it's not black and white like you are saying. "They [double-wishbone suspensions] also provide increasing negative camber gain all the way to full jounce travel unlike the MacPherson strut which provides negative camber gain only at the beginning of jounce travel and then reverses into positive camber gain at high jounce amounts." Double wishbone suspension - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia "not generally considered to give as good handling as a double wishbone suspension, because it allows the engineers less freedom to choose camber change and roll center." MacPherson strut - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia A lot of people remember working on Hondas and Acuras from the 90's and think the suspension behaves the same when they lower their new Hondas. It's not the same camber change at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#285 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() but even then i can see a slight change in camber. Tbot LOL all i can think of is your toe was off enough to cause that, was it corrected since the alignment?
__________________
SSM 11' CRZ EX Tein, Skunk2, Spoon, Blox, PW:JDM, Enkei, Clazzio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#287 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 564
|
BasisSportTony had some 17x8.25" +25 a while back that he sold on here. He said there were no issues with a 205/40 tire other than the rear bumper screw and either camber or slight fender pull in front.
__________________
2011 CR-Z EX, 6MT, CBP, #7960 |
|
|
|
|
|
#288 (permalink) |
|
Supporting Vendor
|
they cleared fine on my car and even when I sold it to a member here onthe forum we didnt have to do any work on his car for them to fit. The only thing I didnt like was the fact that I had to run a 205/40 when I should be running a 205/45 tire. I think the 205/45 shouldnt have any issues either.
Use Willtheyfit.com my biggest flush fitment with out rubbing and modding is a 18x8.5 +35 with a 215/40 you can use that as a exsisting fitment and anything bigger then that will require some shaving or rolling.
__________________
Basis Sport Tuning - CRZ Specialist www.basissporttuning.com 1-909-740-6492 Tony@BasisSportTuning.com http://www.crzforum.com/forum/basis-sport-tuning/
Authorized Dealer of JDP Engineering, Seibon, Password JDM, HKS, Greddy, Volk Racing, Rays Engineering, Takeda and more! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|