Gear Ratios (CVT) - Honda CRZ Forum: Honda CR-Z Hybrid Car Forums
Honda CRZ Forum: Honda CR-Z Hybrid Car Forums

Go Back   Honda CRZ Forum: Honda CR-Z Hybrid Car Forums > Honda CR-Z: Technical > Transmission Discussion

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-28-2010, 04:46 PM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Diane L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 25
Garage
Question Gear Ratios (CVT)

With the CVT the paddle shifters let you kind of take over and shift when you want.

The question is: In each of the three modes (Eco, Normal, Sport) what ratios do you get when using the paddles?

TIA
Diane L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2010, 04:56 PM   #2 (permalink)
Member
 
RiseAgainst197's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 121
Garage
Default

7 ratios in each mode. In Econ mode it always wants to take over and shift, but if you got it in econ mode then you dont want higher rpm's anyway. Kinda defeats the purpose of economy. Normal and Sport will let you carry rpm's all the way to redline and will not shift when you dont want to.
RiseAgainst197 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2010, 03:31 PM   #3 (permalink)
Member
 
Diane L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 25
Garage
Default

That was understood. The question is what ratio is chosen for each gear.
Diane L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2010, 04:11 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
91CRXTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Suffolk Long Island NY
Posts: 1,635
Default

their are no "gears" just shift points, but i still dont have that info either
91CRXTC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2010, 08:01 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
David_PA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: York, PA
Posts: 162
Garage
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diane L View Post
That was understood. The question is what ratio is chosen for each gear.
Is this what you are looking for Diane?

Manual

Gear Ratios: 1st: 3.143, 2nd: 1.870, 3rd: 1.303, 4th: 1.054, 5th: 0.854, 6th: 0.689, Reverse: 3.307, Final Drive: 4.11

CVT

Gear Ratios: 3.173~0.529, Reverse: 5.666~2.167, Final Drive: 4.20
David_PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2010, 08:07 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
GoHuskies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rocky Hill, CT
Posts: 1,223
Garage
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David_PA View Post
Is this what you are looking for Diane?

Manual

Gear Ratios: 1st: 3.143, 2nd: 1.870, 3rd: 1.303, 4th: 1.054, 5th: 0.854, 6th: 0.689, Reverse: 3.307, Final Drive: 4.11

CVT

Gear Ratios: 3.173~0.529, Reverse: 5.666~2.167, Final Drive: 4.20
Going by those numbers the MT gets taller "gearing" for highway which explains how you MT guys are smacking us CVT guys in fuel economy posts.
GoHuskies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2010, 08:28 PM   #7 (permalink)
Dio
Senior Member
 
Dio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: California
Posts: 349
Garage
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoHuskies View Post
Going by those numbers the MT gets taller "gearing" for highway which explains how you MT guys are smacking us CVT guys in fuel economy posts.
Sorry for being noobish. Not very good at this so be nice.

I'd always thought lower gear ratio when cruising would produce better fuel economy. Hence the lowest number for the CVT is smaller than the manual in 6th gear. Doesn't this mean that the CVT when cruising, negating all other variables, would produce better fuel economy? Please enlighten me.
__________________
1987 Honda Prelude Si 5MT (waiting to be rebuild)
2001 Acura MDX
2007 Honda Accord SE
2011 Honda CR-Z EX 6MT
Dio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2010, 12:23 AM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
GoHuskies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rocky Hill, CT
Posts: 1,223
Garage
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dio View Post
Sorry for being noobish. Not very good at this so be nice.

I'd always thought lower gear ratio when cruising would produce better fuel economy. Hence the lowest number for the CVT is smaller than the manual in 6th gear. Doesn't this mean that the CVT when cruising, negating all other variables, would produce better fuel economy? Please enlighten me.
I'm a noob at this as well so take my words with a spoonful of salt!

My understanding is the important number here is the final drive ratio. The MT has a lower ratio hence lower cruising RPM's at minimal load situations.
GoHuskies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2010, 01:01 AM   #9 (permalink)
Member
 
RiseAgainst197's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 121
Garage
Default

A final gear ratio of 4.20(CVT) is a lower gear ratio than 4.11(MT)
RiseAgainst197 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2010, 01:50 AM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
David_PA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: York, PA
Posts: 162
Garage
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RiseAgainst197 View Post
A final gear ratio of 4.20(CVT) is a lower gear ratio than 4.11(MT)
The CVT's final drive of 4.2 provides more torque than the 6MT's final drive of 4.11, but the MTs final drive gives lower rpms.

However, if it's correct to assume that the CVT has an effective highest gear ratio of .529 compared to 6th gear in the manual at .689, you'd have lower rpms at the same speed in final gear with the CVT because it's lowest ratio more than makes up for the less efficient final drive ratio.
David_PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1

Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.