![]() |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Member
|
7 ratios in each mode. In Econ mode it always wants to take over and shift, but if you got it in econ mode then you dont want higher rpm's anyway. Kinda defeats the purpose of economy. Normal and Sport will let you carry rpm's all the way to redline and will not shift when you dont want to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Manual Gear Ratios: 1st: 3.143, 2nd: 1.870, 3rd: 1.303, 4th: 1.054, 5th: 0.854, 6th: 0.689, Reverse: 3.307, Final Drive: 4.11 CVT Gear Ratios: 3.173~0.529, Reverse: 5.666~2.167, Final Drive: 4.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Not very good at this so be nice.I'd always thought lower gear ratio when cruising would produce better fuel economy. Hence the lowest number for the CVT is smaller than the manual in 6th gear. Doesn't this mean that the CVT when cruising, negating all other variables, would produce better fuel economy? Please enlighten me.
__________________
1987 Honda Prelude Si 5MT (waiting to be rebuild) 2001 Acura MDX 2007 Honda Accord SE 2011 Honda CR-Z EX 6MT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
My understanding is the important number here is the final drive ratio. The MT has a lower ratio hence lower cruising RPM's at minimal load situations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
However, if it's correct to assume that the CVT has an effective highest gear ratio of .529 compared to 6th gear in the manual at .689, you'd have lower rpms at the same speed in final gear with the CVT because it's lowest ratio more than makes up for the less efficient final drive ratio. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|