![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sebastian, FL
Posts: 5,322
|
moved to "mpg" forum!
__________________
Facebook: Roberto - Add me as a friend if you want ♫EDM♫ Fans - If you're a fan or just wanna listen Days to a Mile! - Join me on my journey to run a Marathon in 2011! INSANITY Workout!! - This is no joke haha! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Richardson, Tx
Posts: 173
|
Am I wrong? If you are averaging 42.9 and you still have a range of 343 miles, and you already have driven 200.7, that would be about 543 miles on that tank which would be over 51mpg, if you continued at that pace.
If my car says I'm averaging 42.9 with 200 miles on it, my range should only be another 230 miles. Again, am I wrong? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Kuna Idaho
Posts: 2,050
|
Quote:
I am guessing (those pictures were taken awhile ago) that I had been driving using some hypermilageing (sp?) techniques just before taking those pics. Thus the Range would be really high, but the MPG wouldn't have gone up significantly after having 200+ miles on the tank already. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|