0-60 in 4.4s

[ccn88]

come across this! wonder if its true??


--------------------------------------------------------------------

Vehicles
Honda CR-Z V S Honda CRX 1.5
Gearbox : manual 6 gear manual 5 gear
Power : 124 PS 100 PS
Torque : 174 Nm 130 Nm
Weight/Power ratio 10.27 kg/PS 1 9 kg/PS 1

1 Weight (EU) heaviest verified in running order
Average Verified Performances *

CRZ
400m : 17.1 s.
Km : 31.1 s.
0 to 60 : 4.4 s.
0 to 80 : 6.7 s.
0 to 100 : 9.7 s.
0 to 120 : 14.2 s.
0 to 140 : 20 s.
0 to 160 : 27.5 s.
80 to 120 min : 6.6 s.
80 to 120 in 4 : 9.7 s.
80 to 120 in 5 : 14.2 s.
80 to 120 with last gear : 19.9 s.

CRX
400m : 16.5 s.
Km : 30.9 s.
0 to 60 : 4.9 s.
0 to 80 : 6.7 s.
0 to 100 : 9.6 s.
0 to 120 : 13.2 s.
0 to 140 : 19.4 s.
0 to 160 : 30.5 s.
80 to 120 min : 6.2 s.
80 to 120 in 4 : 11 s.
80 to 120 in 5 : 15.1 s.
80 to 120 with last gear : 15.1 s.

* Measures (at real speed) from car magazines : Auto Motor & Sport, Action Auto Moto, AutoCar, Le Moniteur Automobile, Autopista, Car & Driver, Auto Plus, Motorsport
1 Weight (EU) = With 90% fuel load and 75Kg driver
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Im comparing this to the 1.5l CRX, but this site u can compare it to any other car, it looks like a pretty cool site and seem like it might be true, wat do u guys reckon?
Here's the link Honda CR-Z vs Honda CRX 1.5 : The Duel 34022466

[Ludercrz]

KILOMETERS!!! 100km = 60miles which is 9.7sec.

and our cars are faster in the first few seconds of take-off because of the extra power given by the battery, so 4.4sec compared to the CRX's 4.9 is good but you can see it goes downhill after that.

[MattB]

Definitely kilometers as Ludercrz said. 0-60 mph in 4.4 is getting close to supercar territory.

[varg]

Originally Posted by Ludercrz

KILOMETERS!!! 100km = 60miles which is 9.7sec.

and our cars are faster in the first few seconds of take-off because of the extra power given by the battery, so 4.4sec compared to the CRX's 4.9 is good but you can see it goes downhill after that.

Haha, this made me lol. Guess you guys aren't that used to kilometers

[gordonfc]

100 km = 62.5 mph

[DerekS]

The only way this car is getting to 60 in 4.4 is if it falls off a cliff.

Or maybe if it's being pushed by a Ferrari.

[wicked1]

, nice Derek!

[Ludercrz]

Originally Posted by varg

Haha, this made me lol. Guess you guys aren't that used to kilometers

he's from Australia, he should be.

[wizkid057]

Originally Posted by DerekS

The only way this car is getting to 60 in 4.4 is if it falls off a cliff.

Or maybe if it's being pushed by a Ferrari.

If it falls off a cliff it would be an even faster car at 0-60 MPH in 2.737 seconds... 200MPH in 9.123 seconds...

[CR-Z Canadian]

Originally Posted by wizkid057

If it falls off a cliff it would be an even faster car at 0-60 MPH in 2.737 seconds... 200MPH in 9.123 seconds...

So THAT'S why they called it "terminal velocity", back in Physics class!

I like Derek's options, though... still cleaning coffee off my monitor. snicker snicker.