![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Garage | Gallery | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums ReadAuto Escrow | Insurance | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
Share | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Super Duper Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: West Islip, NY
Posts: 1,198
|
Quote:
I test drove both and loved both for different reasons. In the end I chose CVT because my wife wants to drive it too and she cant drive MT... Again, drive both and you'll have your answer......good luck!
__________________
2007 CIVIC EX 5MT (sold) 2011 CR-Z EX CVT (sold) 2011 CIVIC SI 6MT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lewisburg, PA
Posts: 268
|
I'm partial to sports features of the car and therefore never even considered nor tested the cvt so like others here have said its an individual thing. I've seen somewhere though that cvt outnumbers manual about 3-1.One thing to keep in mind though with manual for this car, esp in Frisco is the hill assist feature (on an incline braking automatically continues until clutch engaged). I'd never had it on a car before and its a real advantage once you get used to it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Elite Member
|
The manual clutch is so light, I can't imagine getting tired in day to day driving. IMO, it makes the most of the limited power and the way to go. As I've said, the availability of the manual is the ONLY reason this car was on the shopping list. As others have noted, drive them both, you may not like the CVT after you try it. I believe it is an 'acquired' taste.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|