HCH + CR-Z engine - Honda CRZ Forum: Honda CR-Z Hybrid Car Forums
Honda CRZ Forum: Honda CR-Z Hybrid Car Forums

Go Back   Honda CRZ Forum: Honda CR-Z Hybrid Car Forums > Honda CR-Z: Technical > Engine and Battery Discussion

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-11-2010, 05:35 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
bizzybear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sebastian, FL
Posts: 5,322
Question HCH + CR-Z engine

given these specs of the two electric motors on Honda's current Hybrids...

Civic Hybrid
15 KW motor
20hp / 76lb-ft
width - 70mm

CR-Z Hybrid
10 KW motor
13hp / 58lb-ft
width - TBA

i think it would be safe to say that if you swap the electric motor from the HCH to the CR-Z that would give it total specs of around:
CR-Z + 15 KW motor
129hp / 146lb-ft

versus the current numbers of:
CR-Z
122hp / 128lb-ft

i believe doing this alone should improve gas mileage with the added assist from the electric motor... the only thing slowing something like this swap down would be the ecu/electrical aspects...

(this is assuming the horsepower/torque come in around the same rpm)

thoughts??
__________________
Facebook: Roberto - Add me as a friend if you want
♫EDM♫ Fans - If you're a fan or just wanna listen
Days to a Mile! - Join me on my journey to run a Marathon in 2011!
INSANITY Workout!! - This is no joke haha!
bizzybear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 08:41 PM   #2 (permalink)
Member
 
rd118403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 120
Default

Interesting way of looking at it.. Battery Swap VS the traditional Engine swap. I never thought of that.

Think about this killer combination in terms of performance AND Fuel Economy:

If Honda paired the Engine from the Honda Aquatrax F12X or F15X, + the IMA from the Civic Hybrid:
F12X had 1.2L Turbo Inline 4 with 165HP, F15X has 200HP from 1.5L Inline 4..

F12X Hybrid: 185 HP @ ~6,000 RPM, 220 Tq @ ~1,500 RPM
F15X Hybrid: 220 HP @ ~6,000 RPM, 240 Tq @ ~1,500 RPM

Either of those combos would yield 60 MPG in Econ Mode thanks to small displacement and tons of low-end power, and would do 0-60 in 6-7 seconds in Sport Mode... I'm sure Honda doesn't do something like that because Turbo technology + Hybrid technology equals a greater chance of reliability issues (more stuff that can break), PLUS the specs on the Aquatrax motors are pretty crazy, I bet they cost a lot of money to build relative to the Fit's engine.

Actually, I bet the 1.2L Turbo and NO hybrid system would probably still perform better and get better MPG than the current setup.
__________________
'09 Civic LX Sedan, '05 S2000
'91 CRX Si, '00 VFR800 Interceptor
rd118403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 10:14 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
bizzybear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sebastian, FL
Posts: 5,322
Default

it's actually not even a battery swap... it's just the electric motor swap

lol... funny you should mention the Aquatrax b/c i'm going to be getting a F15X when summer hits
bizzybear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2010, 10:24 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
SpoonCrz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: N. New Jersey
Posts: 350
Default

Hmm..this is very interesting...i wonder if the electric motor will bolt right up.
If it does, will the ecu need tuning? That part im concerned about.
SpoonCrz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2010, 11:02 AM   #5 (permalink)
 
bizzybear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sebastian, FL
Posts: 5,322
Default

if the size specs are the same or similar i can't see why the bolt pattern would be that much different given the similar size in engine... actually, does anyone know the engine code for the 1.3L Insight engine??

the ecu part is whats stumping me too... hopefully Hondata is working on something already
bizzybear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2010, 04:45 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
GoHuskies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rocky Hill, CT
Posts: 1,223
Garage
Default

From owning a civic hybrid I'm not sure upping the assist motor is going to impact fuel economy. Assist from the electric motor is applied as an adder to the engines output. More electric juice = higher engine rev's. ICE plus assist motor work together, output determined by the cars ECU. I assume if you gave a higher output electric motor the engine would still operate as usual. I've always noted the more white bars of assist power I get the higher the engine revs and the further the fuel economy meter drops. Using more juice costs costs more fuel.

I'd love to see someone take a crack at this idea but I think it would involve working with the ECU to fool it into thinking you need less power from the engine.
GoHuskies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 11:24 AM   #7 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 4
Default

I believe much of that engine speed vs. electric motor output will be tunable in the future with aftermarket tuners stepping in. Who knows.. the possibility of raising the overall output of the current CR-Zs electric motor through ecu tuning seems feasible.
Zero Fighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2010, 11:54 AM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
SpoonCrz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: N. New Jersey
Posts: 350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zero Fighter View Post
I believe much of that engine speed vs. electric motor output will be tunable in the future with aftermarket tuners stepping in. Who knows.. the possibility of raising the overall output of the current CR-Zs electric motor through ecu tuning seems feasible.
The tuning part I believe is easy, the capacity of the electric motor might be the handicap. So swaping over a higher capcity unit will make easier to give it more power for a longer duration will make the swap worth it.
SpoonCrz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2010, 04:36 AM   #9 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Halifax, N.S. CANADA
Posts: 2
Default

I agree with the HCH electric swap theory but even if the bolt pattern matches, what about the added weight to the crank? Would this drop Hp value before adding to the overall output?

Just to add some fuel to the burning question of mods, I say supercharge with the larger electric motor. Hondata and AEM are undoubtedly already working with the ECU. The higher output electric should offset the low RPM lag JR systems had with other Honda engines. If this is the same 1.5l used in the Fit/Jazz you could purchase a supercharger right away. I believe the Skunk2/JR merge (Kraftworks) have one on the market now.
__________________
"Nice car, what is it?"
"It's a 1989 Honda CR-X"
"That's an '89? It looks brand new!"
"Thanks , it's a work in progress."
BMXsXeCRX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2010, 03:02 PM   #10 (permalink)
 
bizzybear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sebastian, FL
Posts: 5,322
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMXsXeCRX View Post
I agree with the HCH electric swap theory but even if the bolt pattern matches, what about the added weight to the crank? Would this drop Hp value before adding to the overall output?
if that is the case by adding a bigger electric motor the weight would negate the power gained... since it's off add the lightest flywheel you can find and that should easily balance it back out... in theory of course...
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMXsXeCRX View Post
Just to add some fuel to the burning question of mods, I say supercharge with the larger electric motor. Hondata and AEM are undoubtedly already working with the ECU. The higher output electric should offset the low RPM lag JR systems had with other Honda engines. If this is the same 1.5l used in the Fit/Jazz you could purchase a supercharger right away. I believe the Skunk2/JR merge (Kraftworks) have one on the market now.
Spoon has already modified the engine & ECU somehow and managed to get the electric motor to respond better to those modifications... read more here Spoon CR-Z : Spoon CR-Z Pictures

it's a tweaked version of the L15 from the 2009+ Honda Fit or 2nd generation (not sure what Jazz has exactly)... the kits that are out, are for the 1st generation Fit/Jazz... and even if it was a direct bolt-on, Honda literally had to modify the top of the engine and intake manifold to clear the low-slung hood of the CR-Z... basically the kit might fit the engine but the hood won't close after it's on... trust me i thought of this already haha...
bizzybear is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1

Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.