![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sebastian, FL
Posts: 5,322
|
Civic Hybrid 15 KW motor 20hp / 76lb-ft width - 70mm CR-Z Hybrid 10 KW motor 13hp / 58lb-ft width - TBA i think it would be safe to say that if you swap the electric motor from the HCH to the CR-Z that would give it total specs of around: CR-Z + 15 KW motor 129hp / 146lb-ft versus the current numbers of: CR-Z 122hp / 128lb-ft i believe doing this alone should improve gas mileage with the added assist from the electric motor... the only thing slowing something like this swap down would be the ecu/electrical aspects... (this is assuming the horsepower/torque come in around the same rpm) thoughts??
__________________
Facebook: Roberto - Add me as a friend if you want ♫EDM♫ Fans - If you're a fan or just wanna listen Days to a Mile! - Join me on my journey to run a Marathon in 2011! INSANITY Workout!! - This is no joke haha! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 120
|
Interesting way of looking at it.. Battery Swap VS the traditional Engine swap. I never thought of that.
Think about this killer combination in terms of performance AND Fuel Economy: If Honda paired the Engine from the Honda Aquatrax F12X or F15X, + the IMA from the Civic Hybrid: F12X had 1.2L Turbo Inline 4 with 165HP, F15X has 200HP from 1.5L Inline 4.. F12X Hybrid: 185 HP @ ~6,000 RPM, 220 Tq @ ~1,500 RPM F15X Hybrid: 220 HP @ ~6,000 RPM, 240 Tq @ ~1,500 RPM Either of those combos would yield 60 MPG in Econ Mode thanks to small displacement and tons of low-end power, and would do 0-60 in 6-7 seconds in Sport Mode... I'm sure Honda doesn't do something like that because Turbo technology + Hybrid technology equals a greater chance of reliability issues (more stuff that can break), PLUS the specs on the Aquatrax motors are pretty crazy, I bet they cost a lot of money to build relative to the Fit's engine. Actually, I bet the 1.2L Turbo and NO hybrid system would probably still perform better and get better MPG than the current setup.
__________________
'09 Civic LX Sedan, '05 S2000 '91 CRX Si, '00 VFR800 Interceptor |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sebastian, FL
Posts: 5,322
|
if the size specs are the same or similar i can't see why the bolt pattern would be that much different given the similar size in engine... actually, does anyone know the engine code for the 1.3L Insight engine??
the ecu part is whats stumping me too... hopefully Hondata is working on something already
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
From owning a civic hybrid I'm not sure upping the assist motor is going to impact fuel economy. Assist from the electric motor is applied as an adder to the engines output. More electric juice = higher engine rev's. ICE plus assist motor work together, output determined by the cars ECU. I assume if you gave a higher output electric motor the engine would still operate as usual. I've always noted the more white bars of assist power I get the higher the engine revs and the further the fuel economy meter drops. Using more juice costs costs more fuel.
I'd love to see someone take a crack at this idea but I think it would involve working with the ECU to fool it into thinking you need less power from the engine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 4
|
I believe much of that engine speed vs. electric motor output will be tunable in the future with aftermarket tuners stepping in. Who knows.. the possibility of raising the overall output of the current CR-Zs electric motor through ecu tuning seems feasible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: N. New Jersey
Posts: 350
|
The tuning part I believe is easy, the capacity of the electric motor might be the handicap. So swaping over a higher capcity unit will make easier to give it more power for a longer duration will make the swap worth it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Newbie
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Halifax, N.S. CANADA
Posts: 2
|
I agree with the HCH electric swap theory but even if the bolt pattern matches, what about the added weight to the crank? Would this drop Hp value before adding to the overall output?
Just to add some fuel to the burning question of mods, I say supercharge with the larger electric motor. Hondata and AEM are undoubtedly already working with the ECU. The higher output electric should offset the low RPM lag JR systems had with other Honda engines. If this is the same 1.5l used in the Fit/Jazz you could purchase a supercharger right away. I believe the Skunk2/JR merge (Kraftworks) have one on the market now.
__________________
"Nice car, what is it?" "It's a 1989 Honda CR-X" "That's an '89? It looks brand new!" "Thanks , it's a work in progress."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | ||
![]() Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sebastian, FL
Posts: 5,322
|
Quote:
Quote:
it's a tweaked version of the L15 from the 2009+ Honda Fit or 2nd generation (not sure what Jazz has exactly)... the kits that are out, are for the 1st generation Fit/Jazz... and even if it was a direct bolt-on, Honda literally had to modify the top of the engine and intake manifold to clear the low-slung hood of the CR-Z... basically the kit might fit the engine but the hood won't close after it's on... trust me i thought of this already haha... |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|